In short BGP would just stop working - and the system would bail. This happened on multiple hardware implementations - Dell 2950, Dell R300, HP Equipment as well.
I have asked Chris (who gave up his July 4th Holiday and came in Person to debug - I absolutely love that from an Open Source Guy !!! ) and he even recently still has no clue as to why. We currently are pushing over 5GBPS through pfSense internally - but when we add BGP it just takes a crap This is on multiple links out to the web - some fiber - some wireless - but as a mixed Wireless ISP and Datacenter - not much we can do except to use something that works. Since this is a PF List feel free to hit me off list - as I believe in this project and don't want this to detract from it. On May 28, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Ermal Luçi wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Glenn Kelley <[email protected]> wrote: > Out of interest - why RIPv2 vs OSPF ? > > I guess if link-state, service types and load balancing is not important it > may make sense - > but figured I would ask > > We have migrated for our BGP implementations to use Mikrotik at the > suggestion of a key player here - and could not be happier. > Sadly our multi-honed BGP implementation had tons of issues. > > It would be helpful to know what mikrotik gave you better!? > Which issues you faced on multihomed BGP? > > So they can be taken care in the future if any. > > > Internally however - I still think pfSense Rocks ! > We have a large number of pfsense running virtualized in ProxMox for clients > - most who elected to use PFSense vs. vyatta after we showed them the ease of > use. > > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
