I did not want a war either - figured I might learn something :-) Truth is - I think many do what they feel is best.
I can see how OSPF can become a nightmare to handle if it is not planned well - but I also find the folks who I end up stepping in when they are stuck have tons of other issues. I help operate a WISP network - and when I first got here they had a network all in one broadcast domain. You could be on one end of the network some 65+ miles away and have someone have the ip next to yours. Worse yet - many were in a bridge. Chris helped me learn a ton - and thus perhaps the reason I am personally loyal to pFsense in so many ways. I found he was willing to take the time to not only fix what I broke so many times but to also educate me along the way. Anyhow - I, since we are running a WISP think the OSPF method is best for our case - however I can for sure see the scenario you have described as well. On May 28, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > servers, it was easier to run OSPF on the > servers and carefully redisribute into IS-IS within the > core.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
