On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:06:48 PM Adam Thompson wrote: > On 2013-05-28 11:27, Glenn Kelley wrote: > > Out of interest - why RIPv2 vs OSPF ? > > Simplicity of configuration and troubleshooting. It's > definitely not the best protocol for complex > environments, but there are places where OSPF is simply > overkill - I've seen two OSPF deployments in my career > where some of OSPF's advanced features were needed, and > maybe another half dozen where some of those features > were helpful. In contrast, almost every single OSPF > deployment I've seen or worked on has had issues because > someone set up an overly complex system that they then > tripped over later on.
In fairness, I've heard of deployments where RIP has been implemented for TOR scenarios. Would I do it, probably not. But I can see a use-case. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
