> Am 31.03.2015 um 08:49 schrieb Scott Lambert <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> 
> I remember seeing something years ago about the ability to use pfSense
> as an appliance to run a dedicated process.  I think the post was
> specifically about running a name server.
> 
> My search-fu is not great enough to locate the post/thread I think I
> remember.  Nor is it good enough to find any recent references to using
> pfSense in a non-firewalling/non-routing context.
> 
> I need to roll out some additional cacheing name servers to low power
> sites across my network.  I am thinking of using something along the
> lines of a Via C-7 system we got from Hacom years ago and is laying
> around idle.  Atom processors would likely be better clock cycle/watt
> these days.
> 
> I would prefer to not have to manage a full FreeBSD install and would
> like to use a GUI so the less technical people can "fix" issues when I
> am out of pocket.  I basically want to use pfSense for the GUI and OS
> maintenance with a cacheing name server as the primary role.
> 
> I can always beat the underlying NanoBSD into submission.  However, I
> was hoping there was an option, or series of options, which would make
> this all point and clicky.  If the options exist, I overlooked them
> today while upgrading and re-familiarizing myself with pfSense on the
> old Hacom box and need a clue-by-four to the head.  
> 
> If anyone has a pointer to the documentation or thread describing the
> process, I would very much appreciate a kick in the right direction.



I think what you have in mind is „pfDNS“ - a project from 2008.

https://blog.pfsense.org/?p=244 <https://blog.pfsense.org/?p=244>


Unfortunately, besides the initial release, nothing else surfaced publicly.


_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to