> On Mar 31, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Adam Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 03/31/2015 02:35 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: >> We have plans in this area, but they’re not ‘pfDNS’. > > The pedant in me insists that should be "dnsSense", not "pfDNS". > Or even "bindSense" or "unboundSense", or... etc. > > I'd rather you guys focused on improving the routing capabilities, > personally. (Like being able to run an IGP and an EGP on the same damn box > at the same damn time.) That already stops me from using pfSense in multiple > places today.
I’d also like to build a real router, and a firewall / VPN appliance that will deal well with 1 or more 10G interfaces. But that’s probably not “pfSense”, at least, not the version that people know today. > $0.02 per idea > -$0.02 goodwill discount > ==== > $0.00 net charge Noted. _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
