Nick Cowie wrote:
As a community we take the individual WCAG 2 guidelines (either the draft or if and when the real ones) and translate them into language that could be understood easily by web developers and provided simple check points.
Am I alone in thinking that it's disgraceful that, after years of development, WCAG 2.0 still needs the effort of the community to be made understandable? Are WAI fulfilling their mandate by making the guidelines so dense and obscure that they need translation?
P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
