Germ wrote:
Hey my 2c
Its a bit boring for my likeing....
The banner is a bit bland and the webpage itself is just information.
What about graphics? The banner is just a school of fish. Maybe a
collage or something would be nice. The code may be correct and web
standard but what if it is boring? Does it still make it a succesful
website?? I personally think that a website needs to be web standard but
also eye catching. the trick is to find the balance.
hi,
one usually sees schools of fish on a dive. some designers forget that
the web is the "information" super highway. i believe that most users
of the internet are looking for information. granted graphics can
present a degree of information, but what good are informational
graphics if you're blind? i also think that too many graphics and too
little content makes a page useless and inaccessible from the stand
point of providing useful information to a visitor, especially those
with disabilities.
i think the balance between graphics, or presentation, and content,
information is well done. i think the design is clean and very
professional looking.
you go elle, keep up the good work. does the design stay together at
800x600? i know that a majority of internet users don't view pages at
this resolution these days, but i know a few people that still do; and
nothing makes me it the back button quicker than a site that has a
horizontal scroll bar.
cheers,
dwain
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
