> ...I have yet to understand why the standards committees have
> been 'pruning' the specs of all tools that were useful to achieve such
> affects (this includes the downplaying of IFRAMEs).
I/FRAMES weren't removed because they are frames, I/FRAMES became
obsolete by OBJECT, which offer and need the same configuration (width,
height, overflow). In my opinion IMG should have too.
In XHTML 2.0 the function of OBJECT as I/FRAME becomes obsolete by
<TAG>, because you'll be able to give external content to any element.
It's easy to follow and agree. :)
It's not because of the evil FRAME.
Ciao
Niels
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
