Andrew Cunningham wrote: > It displays in Firefox and IE as I would expect. > > Since you have each list item displaying as an inline element rather > than a block element, it should behave just like any other inline > element, and thus whitespace is important.
> although, in the first example you have five list items, without > space, and with only latin text in the list items and display set to > inline for these elements, you in effect have a single LTR string > separated into five list items embedded in an RTL environment. > the third example (line) you add spaces which are RTL so you ahve > five LTR strings in an RTL element and would be ordered as displayed. > If you wish to properly test RTL behaviour you should use an > appropriate writing script such as Arabic, Syriac, Hebrew, etc. I'm not the one in charge of plugging the content, but I don't think using a different script would make the browser display the elements differently. Removing whitespace between the list items containing the *images* has the exact same effect so I'd say the script used here is irrelevant. Actually, using images to explain this behavior makes perfect sense. These would say "CSS" in LTR *and* RTL <img alt="C" /><img alt="S" /><img alt="S" /> These would say "CSS" in LTR but "SSC" in RTL <img alt="C" /> <img alt="S" /> <img alt="S" /> Let me take back what I said about Opera ;-). Thanks --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
