Thierry Koblentz writes:
Actually, using images to explain this behavior makes perfect sense.
These would say "CSS" in LTR *and* RTL
<img alt="C" /><img alt="S" /><img alt="S" />
These would say "CSS" in LTR but "SSC" in RTL
<img alt="C" /> <img alt="S" /> <img alt="S" />
one of the issues with your example is that you set the unicode-bidi
attribute to "embed". If you didn't have the unicode-bidi set to embed, and
you use latin script characters in your test, you'd get different results in
soem browsers compared to the same markup with arabic characters.
From memory CSS 2.1 treats images as nuetral. if you set it to embed or
bidi-override then images have a strong directionality.
Wouldn't surprise me if you see differences between browsers.
Andrew
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
