[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > this counts as 'progressive enhancement' or not. If it is, then JS is > acceptable (not necessarily best) solution. On the other hand, this > solution has already been discussed in the context of final print > output, and would seem beneficial to all users, regardless of > technology, which makes server-side manipulation much more effective.
Mike, Barney, My previous post was not about the "best" side to do this; it was only related to giving authors options. Some may not want to go with a server-side solution, others may not be able to... This script is just another tool in the box, it doesn't claim to answer a question ;-) --- Regards, Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
