The only time this wouldn't be a correct structure is if the first H3 was
preceeded by an H1 and not an H2
It is slightly conterintuitive to place an H3 above an associted H2. If the
title is the most important fact, above that of date (seems sensible). The
use of H2 and H3 is fine
--
Regards
- Rob Kirton
Raising web standards : http://ele.vation.co.uk
Connecting to others : http://www.linkedin.com/in/robkirton
On 09/12/06, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, list.
>What do you think is the best semantic markup for such a structure
>----
>06.12.2006(date)
>Here goes some title of the new,(example "Manchester United Have Lost
>Their Mojo")
>{and here goes a couple of passages of text - excerpt or full text of
>the news}
>---
[snip]
>Some popular CMS's use
>h3{date}
>h2{title}
><p>{content}</p>
This is usually how I do it (or at least something similar).
>But i don't think it is correct heading structure
Why don't you think this is a correct structure?
~ Tim
www.tjameswhite.com/blog
------------------------------
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
beta.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=45083/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta>
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
