>That's because i think that the headings should have some logical >order, >I mean that before every h3 there should be some h2, that describes in >some sense what about is that h3
[...] >Dont you think that we are losing that logical order in your case? I certainly understand your point. And while I agree that having the <h3> before the <h2> is a little off, I'm willing to accept that because semantically I feel that the title is more important (hence, an <h2>) than the date. Of course, just because the *display* is Date Title doesn't mean that the code has to be that way. Your HTML could be: <h2>Title</h2> <h3>date</h3> and then use a little CSS positioning to move them around. >Im still in doubt is it completely correct to go with it. >if you check your document with validator with the outline option >checked, it will produce smth like >"A level 2 heading is missing!" >See this url for instance >http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcssbeauty.com%2F&charset >=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&outline=1 > Hmm, interesting. Looking at the W3C spec, http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.5.5 it doesn't specify that there needs to be an order, but does have a note that says "Some people consider skipping heading levels to be bad practice." ~ Tim tjameswhite.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
