James Crooke wrote:
> P.S For those that are interested: http://www.kare.com - it's an
> interesting site!
Brilliant! I miss Windows 3 so much - it's all downhill from there!
Interesting to see the person behind all this.
Mihael Zadravec wrote:
> I think that the best resolution was: If changed the default style of
> the button, use "pointer", if not changed, and buttons style is
> browsers default button style, than leave it as it is.
A very sober conclusion, and the one I've gone with. Neither this nor
its opposite are imperative standards in my eyes though.
@Nick:
I think it's fair to conclude that we simply disagree! I still maintain
my belief that the cursor icon does not associate with the difference
between link and button in the minds of most. It is also true that
usability should not be taken lightly, and my decision to change the
cursor over buttons is based entirely on usability considerations.
"Users spend most of their time on other websites... This means that
they form their expectations for your site based on what's commonly done
on most other sites. If you deviate, your site will be harder to use."
While this is a useful mantra to remember, if it is taken as gospel, it
means that a site less confusing and more usable than existing sites is
impossible. If I were more cynical, I might say this is blind and
hopeless promotion of the status quo, whatever it may be, and shuns
innovation. It's like saying you shouldn't vote for people who aren't
already in power!
Regards,
Barney
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
