<cite> is a single element. A full bibliographic reference will typically contain a selection from: Article name Journal name Authors name(s) Editors name(s) Date of publication
and probably a few other things. As you can see, each item needs to be kept distinct from each other, so a single container is not enough. A suitable micro-format would be great, but the point is that regardless of what non-sighted users require, a visual user requires a visual distinction. Clearly each item is of fairly equal importance, so neither <em> or <strong> is appropriate, semantically speaking. Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke > Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [WSG] Legitimate uses of <b> and <i> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > A very similar example would be bibliographic citations > > What's wrong with <cite> then? > > P > -- ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
