On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Caskey L. Dickson wrote: >Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: >> If we introduce folders within folders, we break Maildir++. And there's no >> reason that I can see, to have folders within folders. :/ >I almost fell out of my chair when I first read this because I thought Andreas >was talking about imap folders within imap folders. I couldn't figure out why >he only wanted top-level folders without subfolders. >C=)
Heh - to avoid confusion, let's use the IMAP word "mailbox" when referring to something inside Binc IMAP's realm, and "folder" when discussing physical storage on a file system. Mailboxes inside mailboxes is great, but folders within subfolders of the root Maildir folder is bad. :) Folder. Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | Nil desperandum
