On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Charlie Brady wrote: >On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: >> If .INBOX exists and is a Maildir, then we rename it to an >> appropriate replacement name, such as .INBOX-Renamed, .INBOX-Renamed-<n> >> where n increases. >Why would you do this? So that someone can switch from bincimap to >courier, to binc, to courier, etc? Is it important to support that?
So that anyone could convert from anything Maildir++ compliant to Binc, without "losing" subfolders. Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg Author of Binc IMAP | Nil desperandum
