On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Charlie Brady wrote: > >On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > >> If .INBOX exists and is a Maildir, then we rename it to an > >> appropriate replacement name, such as .INBOX-Renamed, .INBOX-Renamed-<n> > >> where n increases. > >Why would you do this? So that someone can switch from bincimap to > >courier, to binc, to courier, etc? Is it important to support that? > > So that anyone could convert from anything Maildir++ compliant to Binc, > without "losing" subfolders.
IMO that's something which should be done in an installation/migration script, not in the daemon. -- Charlie Brady
