On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Dale Woolridge wrote: > | I guess time(NULL) is the best we can provide if there is no info on > | former uidvalidity values, but if we know the former value we should add 1 > | to it rather than use time(NULL). Or we could wait one second here too > | :-/. > > And there's still the case of NFS exported mailbox disks, with multiple > IMAP servers referencing those disks. A reasonable sysadmin would, of > course, ensure the clocks on these machines are synchronized, but it's > still a valid example.
You could maybe check the time by touching a file and reading back what time the file was modified, instead of doing time(NULL)? ;) Ketil Froyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ketil.froyn.name/
