On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Simon Comeau Martel wrote: > I started to try bincIMAP at the beginning of the week. I don't know if > the problem come from bincIMAP or from my MUA (Sylpheed claws), but the > performances are REALY bad! It took like 9h to mark 10 000 mails as > read! And I never used as much swap before! I have 128 MB ram and 1 > GIG of swap. However, my kernel has to kill bincIMAP a couple of time > because they was both FULL. Scanning a folder is also > resources intensive!
Hmm.. what kind of file system do you store your mail on? Binc shouldn't use that much memory, so I suspect that there may be a memory leak somewhere in binc. Eivind -- | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Lazy on IRC | HP: www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~eivindkv | "Jeg skal vrenge deg med h�ret | Tlf: 22187123/93249534 | inn." | | -- Yang Tse Lyse
