> Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: :) I'll be glad to compare. But as you already know, my knowledge in this area is a bit limited. THREAD and SORT - I did not use those settings in squirrelmail. I think I tried once, but got some error-messages (not sure on this, though). I use it now in Dovecot, though, but the difference in speed was noticable even when I did not. But, no problem to try again - the two daemons are running on different ports on the same box, so it's basically just to change portnumber and the layout of imap-folders in squirrel's config.
So, how do you wish me to compare? :) I'm all yours. - Lasse Danielsen > I'd really like to find out why squirrelmail is so slow with Binc on your > setup :-). With my setup, it's fast (and I'm using the default settings). > > Maybe it's the THREAD and SORT extensions, maybe it's inefficient > operators in Binc. I'd really like to know.. :) > > Do you have the possibility to compare the communication between > Squirrelmail and Binc/Dovecot? > > Andy >
