I've been running SquirrelMail 1.4.1 quite happily with Binc 1.2.1. Haven't seen any issues yet.
Cris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Aardal Hanssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Binc IMAP Server" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 4:51 PM Subject: Re: [bincimap] Just Thought I'd Let You All Know =( > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Matt wrote: > >I've had to migrate from bincIMAP... We're now running courier. > >This is due to the fact that binc consumes too many resources > >READ: 15% CPU as opposed to couriers 5% > >And also binci's insistance on logging to the /var/log/messages file > > It doesn't insist on this. You can set the logging facility yourself in > the Log section. "log facility" can be used to select between the known > facilities, and "log facility number" can be used for unknown facilities. > > >As well as the incompatibility with SquirrelMail 1.4 > > I was under the impression that Squirrelmail 1.4 worked fine with Binc. > What was the greatest problem? > > >Sorry.. maybe we'll try again later. > > Sure :-). Andy > > -- > Andreas Aardal Hanssen | http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg > Author of Binc IMAP | "It is better not to do something > http://www.bincimap.org/ | than to do it poorly." >
