Hi Andreas (2003.09.06_12:12:31_+0200) > >Anyway, it worked as expected. Except that mutt didn't check the > >signature of the attached message (Niether did Mozilla/Enigmail) > > Did you expect them to? I mean - have you seem Mozilla/Enigmail/Mutt check > the signature earlier?
Yes, why not. A rfc822 message should be just the same as a normal email. If it has been signed, the signature should be verified. But it definatly isn't a Binc Bug, so don't worry... Mutt has the same behaviour with local mail. SR -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Stefano Rivera http://rivera.za.net | | H: +27 21 794 7937 () ASCII Ribbon Campaign: | | C: +27 72 419 8559 /\ Say "No!" to HTML email. | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Failure is not acceptable. It comes bundled with Windows.
