As of right now, DA is not on the table. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:42 PM Kent, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> Same here, DA is great. > > > > Mark Kent (MCP) > > Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer > > Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Roland Janus > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:28 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 IBCM > > > > If you have any chance of looking into Direct Access, then don’t bother > with IBCM. > > We just did a proof of concept of DA in a lab env. > > 6 hours and it worked. Given the pre-requisites done before. > > > > DA is amazing > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Sean Pomeroy > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 29. April 2015 16:49 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 IBCM > > > > How is everyone doing IBCM? > > > > We tried to leverage our netscalers, but they do not allow offloading and > verifying the certificate and security won't allow a tunnel without > inspection. > > > > We do not currently have a domain in our DMZ, it seems that is the next > route we are going to go down. However, security will not allow a trust > between the two domains. > > > > Now that MS has sunsetted TMG, what other options is everyone > using/considering? > > > > Thanks, > > Sean > > > > >
