The primary reason is SUP, with inventory and software deployment a very close second. And we do deploy all applications to users, not devices.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:32 PM Sean Pomeroy <[email protected]> wrote: > As of right now, DA is not on the table. > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:42 PM Kent, Mark <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Same here, DA is great. >> >> >> >> Mark Kent (MCP) >> >> Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer >> >> Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Roland Janus >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:28 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 IBCM >> >> >> >> If you have any chance of looking into Direct Access, then don’t bother >> with IBCM. >> >> We just did a proof of concept of DA in a lab env. >> >> 6 hours and it worked. Given the pre-requisites done before. >> >> >> >> DA is amazing >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [ >> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >> Behalf Of *Sean Pomeroy >> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 29. April 2015 16:49 >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 IBCM >> >> >> >> How is everyone doing IBCM? >> >> >> >> We tried to leverage our netscalers, but they do not allow offloading and >> verifying the certificate and security won't allow a tunnel without >> inspection. >> >> >> >> We do not currently have a domain in our DMZ, it seems that is the next >> route we are going to go down. However, security will not allow a trust >> between the two domains. >> >> >> >> Now that MS has sunsetted TMG, what other options is everyone >> using/considering? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Sean >> >> >> >> >> >
