So? I’ve tested deployment to a user, through my mobile, works fine.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sean Pomeroy Sent: Mittwoch, 29. April 2015 21:33 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 IBCM The primary reason is SUP, with inventory and software deployment a very close second. And we do deploy all applications to users, not devices. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:32 PM Sean Pomeroy <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: As of right now, DA is not on the table. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:42 PM Kent, Mark <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Same here, DA is great. Mark Kent (MCP) Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Roland Janus Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:28 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 IBCM If you have any chance of looking into Direct Access, then don’t bother with IBCM. We just did a proof of concept of DA in a lab env. 6 hours and it worked. Given the pre-requisites done before. DA is amazing From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sean Pomeroy Sent: Mittwoch, 29. April 2015 16:49 To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 IBCM How is everyone doing IBCM? We tried to leverage our netscalers, but they do not allow offloading and verifying the certificate and security won't allow a tunnel without inspection. We do not currently have a domain in our DMZ, it seems that is the next route we are going to go down. However, security will not allow a trust between the two domains. Now that MS has sunsetted TMG, what other options is everyone using/considering? Thanks, Sean
