Why the plan to convert to applications? I find applications are a little more difficult to monitor the deployment…
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 12:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Question from the Ignite Conference Yeah, we have a project to migrate over, would love to do a quick turn of everything. Daniel Ratliff From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 2:30 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Question from the Ignite Conference Only packages?? Want me to write something to convert them to applications with the detection method? On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Ratliff <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Still packages here, 1500+ and counting. Daniel Ratliff From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Ryan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 2:13 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Question from the Ignite Conference Someone asked me to write the opposite of that (App->Package) as a right click tool or something like that... I should get on that before applications work 100% in task sequences! :-) Package -> App seems easy enough also. The detection method would be blank (ok, it would be a script detection that didn't do anything) but otherwise it'd be a fully functional application. John, you only write packages, no applications? I've seen most places write everything as an application and then just convert the stuff they need in OSD to packages. On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Ratliff <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Never used it but there is a Package Conversion Manager, not sure if it would eliminate much of the pain though. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=34605 Although its for SP1 only, and is out of support as of March 2014, it does still work: http://gerryhampsoncm.blogspot.com/2014/03/configmgr-2012-sccm-2012-migration.html Daniel Ratliff From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 1:50 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Question from the Ignite Conference Good point… I was too heavily invested in packages before CU4 to have to go back and change to applications would not be fun so I stick with packages. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:37 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Question from the Ignite Conference They are much better since CU4. I use applications almost exclusively and have not had problems. On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Marcum, John <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: From what I’ve seen task sequences don’t like applications in general. I use packages for OSD. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 12:47 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [mssms] Question from the Ignite Conference Hello I vaguely remember hearing that CM2012 will have difficulty installing/provisioning “Applications” (in task sequences) in Windows 10 as well as Office 365 indicating Task Sequences have issues reading the rules associated with those Applications. As I remember they indicated this will NOT be fixed until ConfigMgr 2016 is released. Can anyone corroborate or provide additional information about this? Thanks ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete it from your computer. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
