Chech if the site server computer is part of the local admin group on the DPs and the tag bk folder.
I haven used the built-in backup feature for years, SQL is faster and all is needed to restore. There other drawbacks with built-in backup feature as well. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, 7:13 AM Adamson, Joseph < [email protected]> wrote: > Since Monday my Single site primary SCCM 2012 R2 Sp1 installation has been > generating errors and behaving strangely. > > > > Single site primary Windows 2008R2 Enterprise Server on VMware with sql > 2008R2 on box, 13000 clients 115 distribution points. > > > > Over the past weekend, the site backup failed apparently due to timeout > connecting to network location. > > Also starting Friday evening a colleague started to distribute a 500MB > *package* to all distribution points. > > As of Monday Morning only 75% of the dps had successfully received the > package. I started to review the logs and notes lots of errors in the site > status log (attached) errors connecting to drive volumes on every dp error > 67 error 21 and errors connecting to the registry error 6. > > Using the site server’s system account to connect to dp’s which is a > member of the local administrators group on all dps, remote registry > service is running on all dps. > > Some of the errors are referring to volumes that do not exist on the > server (there is no Z$ on the server in the example below > > EXAMPLE: ---->: *Enumerating drives on the server. > SMS_SITE_SYSTEM_STATUS_SUMMARIZER 11/18/2015 7:03:21 AM 6384 > (0x18F0)* > > *---->: Unable to get the file system information for: > \\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\A$\; error = 67. > Not adding this volume to site object list. > SMS_SITE_SYSTEM_STATUS_SUMMARIZER 11/18/2015 7:03:21 AM > 6384 (0x18F0)* > > *Ignoring drive \\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com > <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\C$\. File \\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com > <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\C$\NO_SMS_ON_DRIVE.SMS > exists. SMS_SITE_SYSTEM_STATUS_SUMMARIZER > 11/18/2015 7:03:21 AM 6384 (0x18F0)* > > *---->: Resource ["Display=\\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com > <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\D$\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=SG1"]\\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com > <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\D$\ is an existing site object. > SMS_SITE_SYSTEM_STATUS_SUMMARIZER 11/18/2015 7:03:21 > AM 6384 (0x18F0)* > > *---->: Resource ["Display=\\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com > <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\I$\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=SG1"]\\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com > <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\I$\ is an existing site object. > SMS_SITE_SYSTEM_STATUS_SUMMARIZER 11/18/2015 7:03:22 > AM 6384 (0x18F0)* > > *---->: Unable to get the file system information for: > \\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\Z$\; error = 21. > Not adding this volume to site object list. > SMS_SITE_SYSTEM_STATUS_SUMMARIZER 11/18/2015 7:03:22 AM > 6384 (0x18F0)* > > *Cancelling network connection to \\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com > <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\ADMIN$. > SMS_SITE_SYSTEM_STATUS_SUMMARIZER 11/18/2015 7:03:22 AM 6384 > (0x18F0)* > > *---->: There are no pollable objects list in the SCF for system > "["Display=\\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com > <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\"]MSWNET:["SMS_SITE=SG1"]\\YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com > <http://YYZFP01.SedgwickCMS.com>\", configured as SMS Site System > SMS_SITE_SYSTEM_STATUS_SUMMARIZER 11/18/2015 7:03:22 AM > 6384 (0x18F0)* > > *---->: Updating SiteObject thresholds from the "SiteObject Thresholds" > property list SMS_SITE_SYSTEM_STATUS_SUMMARIZER > 11/18/2015 7:03:22 AM 6384 (0x18F0)* > > > > Also I noticed that while the SMS_SITE_BACKUP service was stopped on the > site server both the SMS_SITE_SQL_BACKUP service and the > SMS_SITE_VSS_WRITER service were running. > > I tried stopping both and evening setting them to disabled but the keep > getting restarted and have been running continuously at least since Monday. > > The site seems to be functioning ok despite the issues I was able to > create and distribute a test package > > Collections and inventories seem to be running reports as well. > > While my group manages sccm there is another group that manages all of the > windows servers in the field (distribution points) so it is possible a > change was made that broke the remote connectivity but it would have been > “off book” and no one from that group is owning up to it. > > > > Online searches have not provided any help. Any insight would be greatly > appreciated. > > > > *Joseph Adamson* > > Senior Systems Analyst > > > > T: 901.415.7666 > > C: 901.237.7195 > F: 901.415.7404 > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or > taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any > computer. > > >
