The chassis list teaches me stuff every day. Can't say that I contribute much more than questions and links myself :) I think the confusion about CofG has to do with low-speed vs high-speed handling. Sure in the parking lot a GoldWing is easier to muscle around if the mass is close to the ground. "Flicking into a corner" as the moto-journos love to describe it, is all about countersteering causing the bike to twist in the opposite direction, plus some really complicated interactions of rake, trail, contact patches, braking forces yada yada yada. I just try to absorb what the smart guys say and spit it back....

" a ball about between the knees" - what was I drinking? I meant a ball placed approximately between the rider's knees.....

cheers
JF

Mike wrote:
BS alert: low CofG is NOT a good thing necessarily in bikes, unlike cars. I read this low CofG statement all the time in bike mags and moto-journo reviews where they just parrot what the marketing dept says. What the race bikes go for is "mass centralization" which basically seems to mean the heavy bits are concentrated in a ball about between the knees as much as possible. I do approve of the chain drive FWIW. A lot of non-motorcycle types have a strange desire to get rid of the chain, and use a hub motor.

just my 2cents of value. perhaps you don't agree?

Thank you. I get soooo frustrated with people saying that a bike should have a low CG. At the recent Ann Arbor Green Fair I mentioned to a guy that when I put the new Yellow Tops in my bike they had to go in a little lower than the old Hawkers and I felt that had ill effect of the handling. He tried telling me that a low CG was good and that my ill handling must've come from somewhere else. We went back and fourth a few times before he got angry and stormed away. That was a very strange interaction.

I have not read Tony's book yet - can't find a copy at a reasonable price - so I'm pretty ignorant, admittedly. However, I have a theory that the CG location is a ratio of rake, trail and tire diameter.

I used to be on the Chassis Design listserv (http://www.micapeak.com/mailman/listinfo/mc-chassis-design) but they talked right over my head.

Mike


Reply via email to