I have actually talked to the guy that runs Maxdon, and I can tell you they
are focusing all their energy on a very new and very nice Li-ion batteries
specifically for motorcycle applications. And it looks like that has been
updated on their website. I wouldn't count these guys out, they seem to have
a passion for electric motorcycles.


On 1/24/08, Travis Gintz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I understand, but since the launch of the website telling people they
> were going to sell the GPR50, the throttlizer and some other display
> board, they haven't updated anything. Its not vapor ware in that it
> hasn't been built. Its vapor ware because it hasn't been put into
> production.
>
> The least they could do is add a note updating the population about
> its status. The last time they updated the entire website was in
> February of 2007. Thats over a year, and they don't even have a
> product out the door.
>
> I understand you defending it, it does look like a cool product, but
> its far from being a potential for use in a motorcycle.
>
> Regards,
> Travis
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 3:17 PM, lyle sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the guy used to be an avid poster on the old
> > visforvoltage forum and RCgroups...essentially he is
> > taking the same tech used in RC and applying to the
> > alltrax.  Simplistically, his throttleizer works
> > inbetween the magura throttle and the alltrax and acts
> > as a way to guage physical input which then translates
> > that to a smoother response from the alltrax.
> >
> > Its a very simple idea that is very similar to
> > throttle response used in electric RCgroups and should
> > not be marked off as vaporware.
> >
> >
> > --- Travis Gintz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > they've been working on that since like august... no
> > > change on their website.
> > >
> > > Vaporware.
> > >
> > > On Jan 23, 2008 3:48 PM, Eric Cardwell
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > There is a company called Maxdon working on a
> > > device called the
> > > > throttleizer, it is supposed to offer the most
> > > precise torque control.  I am
> > > > not sure if they have this in production yet, but
> > > its worth a look.
> > > > http://www.maxdon.com/tz.html
> > > >
> > > > Eric
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 23, 2008 9:27 AM, SteveS
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I kind of assumed I'd be using a handgrip-type
> > > throttle, like the
> > > > > Magura. But I want to keep the brake lever and
> > > controls from my donor. I
> > > > > can remove the present throttle grip and
> > > mechanism, but I don't know if
> > > > > the cable exiting the Magura would clear the
> > > brake/control casting. One
> > > > > of the cheaper 'scooter' hall-effects probably
> > > would, but they have such
> > > > > a narrow range of motion. And in both cases, the
> > > throttle grip is pushed
> > > > > out further due to the added mechanism, which
> > > may make it hard to grab
> > > > > the brake.....
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm thinking it may be simplest to use a
> > > standard pot box bolted down on
> > > > > the frame under the tank and linking it to the
> > > stock throttle.
> > > > >
> > > > > So - what did you all do?
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW, this is on my BMW conversion (yet unnamed -
> > > I'm not very clever).
> > > > > So far I have the motor coupling and cover
> > > completed and hope to weld up
> > > > > the motor and battery mounts this weekend. Test
> > > batteries are shipping
> > > > > and I'm trying to decide between the 300 and 400
> > > Amp Alltrax.
> > > > >
> > > > > - SteveS
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Travis Gintz
> > > 1986 Honda VFR DC conversion
> > > Http://blog.evfr.net/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and
> > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Travis Gintz
> 1986 Honda VFR DC conversion
> Http://blog.evfr.net/
>
>

Reply via email to