I work with off-grid homes, and nobody splits the series connections
to charge their batteries in parallel, not even the small systems with
4 - 6V batteries. The same is applicable here. In fact few if any use
battery management systems, but for the series chargers we use a BMS
is advisable. The weight for the 6 chargers I carry on board is maybe
6 lbs. The Soneil 1206 which charges at a 6A equiv. runs 14oz. They're
small as well and can be tucked in where you have room.

Jeff



On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:32 AM, David Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you put batteries in parallel they automatically balance each other
>  ... and they will automatically all be charged to the same level by the
>  charger.
>
>  If you bank charge with one charger per battery how do you have any
>  gaurantee the chargers actually all behave the same way?  Chargers are
>  analog devices and some of the components could be different from
>  charger to charger.
>
>  One issue I haven't seen Andrew address is ... if you connect in
>  parallel two batteries who aren't at the same voltage.. clearly they're
>  going to try and equalize when you connect them, so there should be a
>  large spark.
>
>  - David
>
>
>
>
>  Jeffrey Blamey wrote:
>  > If you do the one charger how will you properly charge all the
>  > batteries to the same level. It seems from watching this list for year
>  > that the best approaches are a.) one charger for the series string and
>  > utilize a BMS to ensure all the batteries are at the same level of
>  > charge, or b.) individual chargers and no BMS - I am charging 6A per
>  > battery at the same time and each charger goes into the final stage
>  > when the time is approriate. You are clearly making it harder on
>  > yourself to have to break the series connections between the
>  > batteries.
>  >
>  > Time for the series charge/BMS guys to chime in here.
>  >
>  > Jeff
>  >
>  > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Andrew Wowk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >> In concept, I have to disagree. It is simpler, cheaper, and less bulky. I
>  >> think in abstract terms, all we are really trying to do is break the 
> battery
>  >> pack which is really just one large battery by definition, into 6-cell
>  >> sections for charging. I don't see why one large 12v charger wouldn't work
>  >> well, if not better due to being simpler and easier controlled.
>  >>
>  >> However, there are some advantages to having individual chargers:
>  >>
>  >> ⚫ The maximum current should always be within a predefined limit. It may 
> not
>  >> be with the batteries in parallel & one large charger, due to variations 
> in
>  >> the batteries, battery temperature, and the variation in wire lengths
>  >> connecting them.
>  >>
>  >> ⚫ If the chargers check for battery problems and give some feedback, they
>  >> may not be able to do this properly w/batteries in parallel.
>  >>
>  >> ⚫ In the case of a battery w/shorted cell, the other batteries will be
>  >> charged properly. This may not be the case with batteries charging in
>  >> parallel.
>  >>
>  >> Andrew in NM
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Jeffrey Blamey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >> wrote:
>  >>
>  >>> Sorry as far as the chargers go you can leave the normal series
>  >>> connections in place, and wire each charger to each battery. 6
>  >>> chargers at 6 amps each running their own charging algorith based on
>  >>> each battery state of charge is preferable to one large charger trying
>  >>> to charge 6 batteries in parallel.
>  >>>
>  >>> Just imagine the series string is open, when it is charging it better
>  >>> be. I have left the chargers in the circuit when the bike was turned
>  >>> on but the chargers disconnected from their ac source. No appraent
>  >>> problems with the Electricross chargers.
>  >>>
>  >>> Jeff
>  >>>
>  >>>
>
>

Reply via email to