On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 08:09:49PM -0400, Jim wrote:
> >   
> Here's my thinking and I don't know how the controllers work so I may be 
> off base.  If you have two voltage sources in parallel and one of them 
> is generating a higher voltage, current will flow from the higher 
> voltage source to the lower voltage source and the load.

Please correct me if I'm worng :) - but isn't "voltage is the same
everywhere in a parallel circuit, current varies" part of Ohm's Law?  I
may be 20-some years out of practice, but I think I recall that one
correctly. I suspect that you were thinking of internal resistance
rather than voltages.

In addition, current in a pair of paralleled generators is additive;
current from a larger one will not flow through a smaller one, since
there's no voltage differential, but will simply be added to the total.

> So I'm guessing that the input impedance (resistance) of a controller is 
> very low such that the panels are almost short circuited and there is 
> almost no measurable voltage at the input of the controller.  Then 
> current from both sources would be available. 

That's not exactly how internal resistance (not impedance - that would
only matter in an AC circuit, and not "input resistance" - there's
really no such thing) works. I'm sure that it _is_ low for these
controllers - there'd be no reason for it to be otherwise, and the
controller wouldn't be able to work if it was - but the input of that
controller is, again, a parallel connection:

 .______.______________.
 |      |              |
 |+     |+             |+
---    ---         ----------
 -      -         |Controller|     
 |-     |-         ----------
 |      |              |-
 -----------------------

Hence, the voltage will be the same at the controller input as it is at
the panel output, barring a tiny drop through the wires (which are a
series connection, of course.)

> That analysis didn't come to the conclusion I was aiming for, but that's 
> OK.  It supports Lee's suggestion.  If there is a marginal advantage to 
> two controllers, it's probably not worth it.

My analysis is essentially the opposite of yours, and yet I agree with
your conclusion. Given the cost of a controller, and the gain to be had
for that cost, you'd be much better off buying more panels with that
money, and just enough controller capacity (plus a safety margin) to
handle that panel output.


-- 
* Ben Okopnik * Editor-in-Chief, Linux Gazette * http://LinuxGazette.NET *
_______________________________________________
Liveaboard mailing list
[email protected]
To adjust your membership settings over the web 
http://www.liveaboardnow.org/mailman/listinfo/liveaboard
To subscribe send an email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
The archives are at http://www.liveaboardnow.org/pipermail/liveaboard/

To search the archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

The Mailman Users Guide can be found here 
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/index.html

Reply via email to