bulbazord wrote: I'd be alright with doing 2 PRs.
I won't outright reject this change if it requires a larger refactor that will come later (despite my earlier rejection). Before accepting though, it would be nice to know if my suggestion is feasible. I'd prefer to avoid introducing another footgun in LLDB if possible. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179524 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
