jingham added a comment.

To me, the determinant here is whether the llvm project sees many more 
interactive tools in its future.  If lldb is the only one, then moving all this 
functionality to llvm seems like effort better spent elsewhere.  But if there 
are other interactive tools in the offing, it would be great to have all such 
tools have a common behavior, and so there's good motivation for doing this 


lldb-commits mailing list

Reply via email to