Yes. I’ll handle the documentation updates too. I’ll base the list of C++11 features on the MSDN documentation.
-Chris > On Jan 30, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbiene...@apple.com> wrote: >> +Alex Bradbury >> >> Sounds to me like we have no known users still on VS 2012. >> >> So, how about we plan to move forward again with Chandler’s proposal for >> making this transition. For those who don’t want to dig through to the >> beginning here’s the basic plan: >> >> 1) Loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev (Done!) >> 2) Wait until this email fully circulates in digests and LLVM Weekly so that >> everyone who has an objection can voice it >> 3) If there are no objections, Commit a change to the CMake build which >> errors on old MSVC versions >> 4) Revert and fix buildbots >> 5) Repeat 3 & 4 until no issues >> 6) Once the change is live for a week with no issues, update the >> documentation to reflect the minimum required MSVC version as 2013 > > Also: > > 7) Update the documentation as to what minimum set of C++11 features > are allowed in the code base. > >> Alex, can you please make sure that this plan makes it into the next LLVM >> Weekly? If there are no objections this time I will update CMake files a few >> days after the LLVM Weekly goes out. > > Can you also handle the documentation updates a few days after the > CMake changes have been made live? > > Thanks! > > ~Aaron _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
