> On Feb 21, 2017, at 5:08 PM, Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 21, 2017, at 4:49 PM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev
>> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 21, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev
>>> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> - StepOverBreakpointTestCase: Have the test not store the breakpoints
>>>> in the test case object. Basically, declare that this is not a bug,
>>>> and it's the users responsibility to clean up necessary objects.
>>>
>>> It would be nice to avoid this.
>>>
>>>>
>>
>> I don't agree with this. I think trying to force folks using the API from
>> Python to manually clear all stored objects would be really obnoxious. If
>> anything, we should figure out how to make this accidental failure into an
>> intended failure so we can make sure we don't end up requiring this kind of
>> micro-management.
>
> It's possible you meant "it would be nice to avoid it's being the user's
> responsibility to clean up necessary objects", in which case sorry for
> mis-reading but happy we agree...
Yep, that is what I meant. No one should have to worry about cleansing any
variables. It should just work. So we need to pick the lldb::SB objects that
have strong reference very carefully.
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
