2014-04-29 16:13 GMT+02:00 Tres Finocchiaro <tres.finocchi...@gmail.com>: > These ideas aren't all relevant to LSP2. They should instead be in an LMMS > enhancement request.
They are because you need to have a future API in mind that we can use in LMMS. Hacking in web resources later is more work (I experienced that a few years ago with the current LSP). @Vesa: the resource framework including UI is completely flexible. You can still have arbitrary tabs and "mount" whatever local or remote resource DB wherever you want (it's a model/view architecture based on Qt's model view architecture). It was even planned to make this fully configurable. People like you could remove the LSP tab at all. Toby ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
