On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerf...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> 2014-04-29 16:13 GMT+02:00 Tres Finocchiaro <tres.finocchi...@gmail.com>:
> > These ideas aren't **all** relevant to LSP2. They should instead be in
> an LMMS
> > enhancement request.
>
> They are because you need to have a future API in mind that we can use
> in LMMS. Hacking in web resources later is more work (I experienced
> that a few years ago with the current LSP).
Agreed. I should have put more emphasis on the word "ALL". These emails
go into quite a bit of design detail about the LMMS interface. I'd just
hate for ALL of these concerns to be filed away in an LSP2 request.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
