I don't know what kind of functionality already made for 1.2.0, but I guess the milestones is then postponed? https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/milestones/1.2.0 Stability is the best, and some small enhancements (like logical key shortcuts, and more: http://linuxmultimediastudio.blogspot.no/2014/07/simple-enhancement-or-bug-fixes-that.html). So I guess 1.2.0 will get a lot of new features anyway.
diiz wrote > Ok, we have two options. > > 1. After we release 1.1, we'll concentrate on stabilizing & bugfixing > 1.2 with the features it has currently, and release it as soon as > possible. Then 1.1 remains a short-lived interim release, and 1.2 > becomes the new stable, while we work on new features for 1.3 - tempo > track, sample tracks, etc. 1.3 gets released at the end of the year. > > 2. After we release 1.1, we'll keep working on 1.2 and keep implementing > new functionality for it. 1.1 becomes the new stable branch, while we > work on new features for 1.2, and there will be no 1.3 - 1.2 will be the > last point release for this year, probably getting released at the end > of the year. > > Both options have their merits. Even though I've been doing most of the > heavy coding lately (seriously, how did that even happen?) I don't want > to decide this unilaterally, so let's hear some opinions. Should we have > 3 or 4 point releases this year? -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-x-tp10165p10199.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
