Hi Phil, thanks for the detailed response, greatly appreciated! On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:28:36PM -0500, Phil (list) wrote: > ... > The real value of those projects is not the > finished work, but rather using the projects to help figure out where > the tool is limited and address workflow issues which results in > improvements in Blender itself. > ...
I totally agree with this statement, actually I wanted to pass this message on the beginning of this thread, but it seems that I've failed. Dicovering what blocks people from using LMMS as a fundamental tool in their workflow would be something great. For example: suppose you ask producer John Doe, which has produced songs for a specific genre to try to do it on LMMS. Sometime he'll be stuck and won't be able to reproduce a pattern/effect/sound that would be easy on other DAW. Tres already pointed out that this is the case a lot of times. If we create and grow a base of knowledge of these general usability/feature/performance issues we could focus on improving LMMS on a greater qualitative level. Of course, I am probably being more ambitious than I should for our current moment: not crashing the software randomly and similar critical issues should be our focus instead. But we can aspire more, right? :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
