2017-07-17 17:39 GMT+02:00 martin <martin.drautzb...@web.de>: > Am 07/16/2017 um 04:58 PM schrieb Robert Jonsson: > > If you are using audio inside muse you can get something like this with > group tracks. > > Except that this doesn't work for midi tracks. >
Correct, but if the sound is produced by a soft synth you are in audio-land again and it's a working solution. > > > > What I think we could use, to take arrangement structure further are > folder tracks. > > That would be sufficient, except I would not know what else I could do > with a folder track. I mean it would lack most of > the other properties of a track. > The main use for folder tracks is that you can collapse them so the contents is not visible. The larger arrangements I've made myself get to the point where it is hard to keep track of the tracks you are working on, so much scrolling up and down. Putting different parts of the arrangement in folder tracks you can collapse the parts of the arrangement you aren't working on so the interesting tracks can mostly be viewed without scrolling. > > Am 07/15/2017 um 07:33 PM schrieb Tim: > > > Interesting. First impressions, overkill to add a 'multiple arrangement' > > system and UI /just/ for muting, I would tend to gravitate toward > coding support > > /if/ it were useful for other things like switching among volumes, > pans, controllers etc. > > I bet that would help you too? > > It sure would. However, volumes and pans raise some questions concerning > mixer automation. I wouldn't know how the two > are supposed to work together. Unless you manyfy the mixer automation to > one per arrangement, that is. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Lmuse-user mailing list Lmuse-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user
