I agree. It's best to have a definitive version 1 and then have version 2 if version 1 is complete and available. No need for dangling patches.
Bill On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Savolainen, Petri (NSN - FI/Espoo) < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:lng-odp- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Maxim Uvarov > > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:12 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH v2 2/2] Timer example error check > > > > On 09/02/2014 05:31 PM, Ola Liljedahl wrote: > > > If we wait with these patches, my new timer API and implementation is > > > complete. Just going through the patch creation stage and fixing the > > > miscellaneous complaints. > > > > > Ola, if it's reasonable we can wait. > > > > Maxim. > > What's the benefit of not merging it while we are waiting for Ola? It's > trivial improvement to the current implementation. > > -Petri > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
