Your just too quick, Ola. :)
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ola Liljedahl <[email protected]> wrote: > Version 2 has already arrived. Version 1 doesn't seem to reach > completeness. > > > On 2 September 2014 18:39, Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I agree. It's best to have a definitive version 1 and then have version >> 2 if version 1 is complete and available. No need for dangling patches. >> >> Bill >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Savolainen, Petri (NSN - FI/Espoo) < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: [email protected] [mailto:lng-odp- >>> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Maxim Uvarov >>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:12 PM >>> > To: [email protected] >>> > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH v2 2/2] Timer example error check >>> > >>> > On 09/02/2014 05:31 PM, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >>> > > If we wait with these patches, my new timer API and implementation is >>> > > complete. Just going through the patch creation stage and fixing the >>> > > miscellaneous complaints. >>> > > >>> > Ola, if it's reasonable we can wait. >>> > >>> > Maxim. >>> >>> What's the benefit of not merging it while we are waiting for Ola? It's >>> trivial improvement to the current implementation. >>> >>> -Petri >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lng-odp mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> >> >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
