Version 2 has already arrived. Version 1 doesn't seem to reach completeness.
On 2 September 2014 18:39, Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. It's best to have a definitive version 1 and then have version 2 > if version 1 is complete and available. No need for dangling patches. > > Bill > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Savolainen, Petri (NSN - FI/Espoo) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [email protected] [mailto:lng-odp- >> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Maxim Uvarov >> > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:12 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH v2 2/2] Timer example error check >> > >> > On 09/02/2014 05:31 PM, Ola Liljedahl wrote: >> > > If we wait with these patches, my new timer API and implementation is >> > > complete. Just going through the patch creation stage and fixing the >> > > miscellaneous complaints. >> > > >> > Ola, if it's reasonable we can wait. >> > >> > Maxim. >> >> What's the benefit of not merging it while we are waiting for Ola? It's >> trivial improvement to the current implementation. >> >> -Petri >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp > >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
