On 09/22/2014 03:53 PM, Mike Holmes wrote:
I think that given the lack of a clear reason to pick branches or
repos and the spread of opinion the new proposed maintainers should
pick, Maxim are you going to lead that effort ?
Maxim - generic
Venki - DPDK
Taras - KS2
Ciprian - Netmap
I think that for all the public implementations we have we want the
same approach across them don't we ?
Yes, the same approach. I sent picture how odp v1.0 will be merged from
other branches / gits. Please take a look and
we can discuss that.
Maxim.
On 22 September 2014 01:48, Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It's the same discussion going online and offline here. I will try
to draw scheme for git repos and branches to be more clear what
will be merged from where.
Maxim.
On 09/20/2014 04:05 AM, Jacob, Jerin wrote:
On Sep 19, 2014 4:18 PM, Taras Kondratiuk
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 09/19/2014 02:28 PM, Jacob, Jerin wrote:
How about git "submodules", A master git odp repo and
platforms specific
sub repos within it.Best of both worlds.
http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules
I had very unpleasant experience with git submodules.
Better to go with a repo tool and host a manifest with open
implementations.
Both tools are used for supporting repo inside repo workflow.
Yes, repo may be a good choice(Widely used in android community)
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
--
*Mike Holmes*
Linaro Technical Manager / Lead
LNG - ODP
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
