-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
* Corey Burger: > On 10/23/06, Jono Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I think we need a cool logo for the Ubuntu project. One that symbolises >> these things: > > Can I play devils advocate here? Why do Ubuntu projects need logos? > The marketing, artwork and doc teams don't have one. Country teams are > slightly different, as are different distros. > > Logos can cause serious issues. They can dilute the overall message, > but having too many confusing images. > > So, can somebody come up with a clear arguement why the collected loco > teams need a logo when nobody else does? I agree - the Ubuntu logo is awesome already and it should be used as it is without spin-offs, as Corey says, they dilute the message. The sites I'm involved with, the documentation websites and ubuntu-it use the original Ubuntu logo, and so do fridge.u.c and planet.u.c for that matter. M -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFPb2qtSaF0w5rBv8RAkfdAJ9jgUGp0z2MB6na62YI/NZq7STy9ACffBXC KK82IsRdtNWputNFQ5fgBvc= =ij05 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
