-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * Jono Bacon: > It seems to me the general consensus seems to be that there is no real > objection to a logo, just some people don't really see point.
I don't think that is a fair analysis of this thread. I haven't seen anyone express the view that there might not be a point - the concern that myself, Corey and Christer seem to have is that developing a variation of the Ubuntu logo will cause unnecessary dilution of the Ubuntu logo. I don't think anyone has questioned whether there is a need for a logo. I think a customised header for general locoteam related pages might be a good idea, if the Ubuntu logo is preserved. Sorry that I seem to be banging on a bit about it - but each time you post, I worry that you haven't understood the point we've raised, so I just want to make it clear. I have no issue with a decision being taken the other way. I'm sure lots of people think that a customised logo might be a good idea and don't share our concern. Matt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFRNEOtSaF0w5rBv8RAotYAJoC7AI9AI3WPSn9YYByKihNrEflpQCeMnro x6s3D26vsKnVL42Zpl6txqc= =z74J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
