Op maandag 26-04-2010 om 00:23 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef David Rubin: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Efrain Valles > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would like to know how this is buroucratic, It is fourthed > > commitment to your role as a leader. A way to acknowledge your > > commitment. To simply let others know you are taking "leadership by > > example".
To give an example: we organize booths at several computer fairs & other events, and we always try to find local people to organize & coordinate the booth. In some cases those people only do this once (or once a year), and some of them might not have a Launchpad account yet, and not know how GnuPG works. And in some cases they might not know English very well either. Asking those people to make a LP account, create a GnuPG key and upload it, and sign some text & upload it, could very well result in a serious loss in enthusiasm to volunteer... ;) Still, they are (temporary) "leaders", as they have responsibilities towards the other volunteers at the event and towards the ubuntu-be & ubuntu communities. As such they can/will also be "judged" by the LCoC. > I was talking about how we define leadership and this always begs the > question where do you draw the line at leadership. So indeed: where do we draw the line for *requiring* signing of the LCoC? -- Jan Claeys -- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
