On 13-02-06 11:47 PM, YoBoY wrote: > Le 06/02/2013 20:23, Laura Czajkowski a écrit : >> >> status = Verified, Evaluated, Reviewed, Sponsored >> > > Hi, > > It's great to see a change on this "approved" status (who just give us > some CDs and gifts sometimes). I really like the idea. If I have to > choose one of the proposition, I'll go with the Reviewed. > > But, in fact, if I think about it, I would prefer to name the > "unapproved/unverified/unevaluated/unreviewed/unsponsored" locoteams. > All the teams are locoteams and should be called that, without a > status. The unapproved are, for me, just teams who still need advices, > help, structure,… to fill or surpass the template of a locoteam. To > resume, if locoteams are Jedis, the unaproved teams are Padawans. I > can't give proposition, my english vocabulary is too poor for that, > and it's just my opinion. > > Big hug everyone and thanks for all the good work, > > YoBoY >
+1 for "Sponsored" We should resist the temptation to assume that an "Unapproved" team is somehow deficient. Some "Unapproved" teams actually have a high level of activity and organization, and in some cases, other sponsorship models (even self-sponsorship). Cheers, Randall
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
