On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Laura Czajkowski <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/02/13 18:06, Martin Owens wrote: >> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 19:43 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: >>> But wont it be too harsh on other loco teams as it gives rise to a >>> thinking that they are marked as inactive just because they might have >>> forgotten/dint have time to update their wiki or portal page for some >>> time whilst organizing events on a regular basis? >> We've made the tools pretty easy, if there's no activity on the portal >> page, then there's really no way to know 'online' if there is activity. >> So an online-activity status must follow from online-activity, not from >> offline-activity. >> >> We can't really measure offline-activity. >> >> Martin, >> >> > No I think that's a bit unfair the loco council has looked at team > report, blog posts, photos of events that happen off line and we make > the judgement call. Many people create events on the LTP, some don't > but do add it to their website. While it is not mandatory to use the > LTP and many people do use it some teams prefer to use their own tools. >
+1 Laura Regards, -- Bhavani Shankar Ubuntu Developer | www.ubuntu.com https://launchpad.net/~bhavi -- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
